Re: [HACKERS] Suggestion: Which Binary?

From: David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Suggestion: Which Binary?
Date: 2006-04-25 15:57:11
Message-ID: F7E0FDF3-6E10-47FD-9A4A-08B7A74E4400@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Apr 25, 2006, at 08:19, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I have applied the attached patch, and updated descriptions for the
> items you were uncertain of. I didn't add defaults for some of
> the more unusual entries, but just left them blank.

Cool, thank you, Bruce.

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-04-25 16:48:04 Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes
Previous Message Ben Clewett 2006-04-25 15:53:32 Installation on Duel-Core Pentium XP

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-04-25 20:47:42 Re: PL/PGSQL: Dynamic Record Introspection
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-04-25 15:27:07 Re: [PATCHES] Implementing RESET CONNECTION ...