From: | David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Suggestion: Which Binary? |
Date: | 2006-04-25 15:57:11 |
Message-ID: | F7E0FDF3-6E10-47FD-9A4A-08B7A74E4400@kineticode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Apr 25, 2006, at 08:19, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have applied the attached patch, and updated descriptions for the
> items you were uncertain of. I didn't add defaults for some of
> the more unusual entries, but just left them blank.
Cool, thank you, Bruce.
Best,
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-04-25 16:48:04 | Re: [GENERAL] Concurrency problem building indexes |
Previous Message | Ben Clewett | 2006-04-25 15:53:32 | Installation on Duel-Core Pentium XP |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-04-25 20:47:42 | Re: PL/PGSQL: Dynamic Record Introspection |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-04-25 15:27:07 | Re: [PATCHES] Implementing RESET CONNECTION ... |