| From: | "Walker, Jed S" <Jed_Walker(at)cable(dot)comcast(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Forcing WAL switch |
| Date: | 2005-08-11 22:14:21 |
| Message-ID: | F7638DABBEBB4A4CB70616DE2B19E6B806729D@COENGEXCMB01.cable.comcast.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-novice |
How do you do that?
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 4:12 PM
To: Walker, Jed S
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Forcing WAL switch
"Walker, Jed S" <Jed_Walker(at)cable(dot)comcast(dot)com> writes:
> If the backup completes, I switch the database out of "backup mode",
> and then switch a WAL and it archives, then I know my backup directory
> contains the backup and the WAL(s) needed to bring the database to a
> consistent state. So, if I can switch a WAL after the backup, then I
> truly have a complete backup.
How is "switch a WAL" an essential component of that scheme? You can
archive the latest active segment just as well.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-08-11 22:20:42 | Re: Forcing WAL switch |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-08-11 22:11:30 | Re: Forcing WAL switch |