| From: | Marc Bachmann <marc(dot)brookman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, jeremy(at)musicsmith(dot)net, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #16040: PL/PGSQL RETURN QUERY statement never uses a parallel plan |
| Date: | 2021-10-03 18:01:56 |
| Message-ID: | F67D5BE1-3FCA-4106-AC75-0AEF6DD9F8A2@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
I’m happy to help.
And sorry that you had to go through that many changes right after the release.
Kind regards
Marc
> On 3 Oct 2021, at 19:22, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> I wrote:
>> Marc Bachmann <marc(dot)brookman(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> A function that inserts data and tries to return with a table now results in the error `query is not a SELECT`.
>>> In previous versions that query succeeded.
>
>> Hmm ... I'm a bit surprised that that worked before, but since it did,
>> we shouldn't break it.
>
> Fix pushed, thanks for the report!
>
> regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Dilger | 2021-10-03 22:20:20 | Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-10-03 17:22:48 | Re: BUG #16040: PL/PGSQL RETURN QUERY statement never uses a parallel plan |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-10-03 19:14:58 | Triage on old commitfest entries |
| Previous Message | vignesh C | 2021-10-03 17:55:27 | Re: Added schema level support for publication. |