Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #3563: DATESTYLE feature suggestion

From: Ben Hockey <neonstalwart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #3563: DATESTYLE feature suggestion
Date: 2010-05-16 05:53:44
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugs
i apologize for bringing this up from over 2 years ago but i haven't  
been able to find how this issue was resolved.

the following is from the ecmascript 5 specification at 
  page 168:

> Date Time String Format
> ECMAScript defines a string interchange format for date-times based  
> upon a simplification of the ISO 8601
> Extended Format.  The format is as follows: YYYY-MM-DDTHH:mm:ss.sssZ

ecmascript 5 is the most recent specification for JavaScript and i  
would think that having a DATESTYLE format to simplify  
interoperability with JavaScript applications would be highly  
desirable.  simplifying interoperability could be achieved by either  
providing a new format that matched this specific format or by  
allowing a way to specify a custom DATESTYLE format.  being able to  
specify a custom DATESTYLE format would be preferred since it is the  
more flexible option.

perhaps this is already possible but i just haven't managed to find  
it.  any help appreciated.



On Aug 21, 2007, at 7:53 PM, Randolf Richardson wrote:

> The following bug has been logged online:
> Bug reference:      3563
> Logged by:          Randolf Richardson
> Email address:      randolf+postgresql(dot)org(at)inter-corporate(dot)com
> PostgreSQL version: 8.2.4
> Operating system:   NetBSD 4 (beta), NetBSD 3.1, NetWare 6.5
> Description:        DATESTYLE feature suggestion
> Details:
> After convincing clients and colleagues to switch from Oracle (and  
> others)
> to PostgreSQL, an issue that comes up is the need to customize  
> Because this isn't possible, the developers who were against the  
> move to
> PostgreSQL make it political and recommended work-around solutions  
> such as
> using to_char() or implementing a view for each table that contain
> TIMESTAMP[TZ]s is very difficult to argue with management because a  
> lot of
> time is required to implement these items.
> In a future version, to solve this problem, an additional DATESTYLE  
> option
> that uses the same rules as the to_char() function for date  
> formatting would
> solve this problem.  Here's an example:
> This feature would not only resolve this particular political  
> strife, but
> would also solve many other problems, including simplifying coding  
> for raw
> SQL output serving as reports (e.g., users still get confused about  
> dates
> like "2007-06-03," wondering if they refer to June 3rd, or March 6th).
> I'm hoping that this suggestion will be an easy one to implement.
> Thanks in advance.
> P.S.:  I searched around for a "feature suggestions" page but  
> couldn't find
> it (if one exists, it should be linked to from the "Report a Bug"  
> page).

In response to


pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2010-05-16 06:22:51
Subject: Re: BUG #3563: DATESTYLE feature suggestion
Previous:From: Russell SmithDate: 2010-05-15 09:19:01
Subject: Re: pg_restore ignores -C when using a restore list -L

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group