| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add support for AT LOCAL |
| Date: | 2023-07-03 13:42:44 |
| Message-ID: | F4DEB3EA-260A-4B50-94E0-D7F9D94C5918@yesql.se |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 6 Jun 2023, at 05:13, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> wrote:
> Patch against 3f1aaaa180 attached.
This patch fails to compile, the declaration of variables in the switch block
needs to be scoped within a { } block. I've fixed this trivial error in the
attached v2 and also reflowed the comments which now no longer fit.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-Add-support-for-AT-LOCAL.patch | application/octet-stream | 9.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2023-07-03 13:45:52 | Is a pg_stat_force_next_flush() call sufficient for regression tests? |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2023-07-03 13:27:27 | Re: Track Oldest Initialized WAL Buffer Page |