Re: bug of recovery?

From: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bug of recovery?
Date: 2011-09-26 22:28:33
Message-ID: F4BDC274-D382-4BC2-A093-282E29523DD8@phlo.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sep26, 2011, at 22:39 , Tom Lane wrote:
> It might be worthwhile to invoke XLogCheckInvalidPages() as soon as
> we (think we) have reached consistency, rather than leaving it to be
> done only when we exit recovery mode.

I believe we also need to prevent the creation of restart points before
we've reached consistency. If we're starting from an online backup,
and a checkpoint occurred between pg_start_backup() and pg_stop_backup(),
we currently create a restart point upon replaying that checkpoint's
xlog record. At that point, however, unresolved page references are
not an error, since a truncation that happened after the checkpoint
(but before pg_stop_backup()) might or might not be reflected in the
online backup.

best regards,
Florian Pflug

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message panam 2011-09-26 22:54:10 Re: fix for pg_upgrade
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-09-26 21:46:12 Re: BUG #6218: TRAP: FailedAssertion( "!(owner->nsnapshots == 0)", File: "resowner.c", Line: 365)