Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_receivewal and SIGTERM
Date: 2022-09-14 14:37:58
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 2 Sep 2022, at 10:00, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 09:51:26AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Fine by me if both you and Daniel want to be more careful with this
>> change. We could always argue about a backpatch later if there is
>> more ask for it, as well.
> Daniel, are you planning to apply this one on HEAD?

I had another look over this and pushed it.

Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Maxim Orlov 2022-09-14 14:53:48 Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Support load balancing in libpq
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-09-14 14:21:06 Re: SUBTRANS: Minimizing calls to SubTransSetParent()