Re: Report relation extension blockers within parallel lock groups

From: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Report relation extension blockers within parallel lock groups
Date: 2026-08-31 11:28:11
Message-ID: F1C371A6-82FE-48D4-8D2F-69D325C4D8B4@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Aug 31, 2026, at 18:38, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 05:22:20PM +0800, Chao Li wrote:
>>> On Aug 31, 2026, at 10:39, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Looks like 3ba59ccc896e did the same thing for page locks,
>
> Right, but 3ba59ccc896e was reverted by cc32ec24fdf (and backpatched through 13).
>

Ah, then sorry for the noise.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrey Borodin 2026-08-31 11:30:17 Re: 028_pitr_timelines.pl might fail when cp interrupted and backup includes required segment
Previous Message Bertrand Drouvot 2026-08-31 11:27:07 Re: pg_upgrade: Test --check with a running source server