Re: Conflict with recovery on PG version 11.6

From: Toomas Kristin <toomas(dot)kristin(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Conflict with recovery on PG version 11.6
Date: 2020-06-20 03:51:24
Message-ID: F169AE77-1612-45AD-A12C-6BBDC74216B7@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi Laurenz,

> Yes, that are conflicts with VACUUM.

Thank you for help. hot_standby_feedback did what I expected (no lag on replication and no session termination) and case is closed. Only it is foggy for me how it can be when no logs about vacuuming from that time window when session is active on standby host.

BR,
Toomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2020-06-20 04:10:30 Re: create batch script to import into postgres tables
Previous Message Praveen Kumar K S 2020-06-20 03:15:09 [HELP] Query regarding logical replication slot