Re: new heapcheck contrib module

From: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: new heapcheck contrib module
Date: 2020-07-22 00:47:12
Message-ID: F0A32F00-C56A-4010-8024-685E9761C8CB@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Jul 20, 2020, at 11:50 PM, Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 10:58 AM Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> I think new structures should be listed in src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list,
>> otherwise, pgindent might disturb its indentation.
>>

<snip>

>
> In v11-0001 and v11-0002 patches, there are still a few more errmsg that need to
> be joined.
>
> e.g:
>
> + /* check to see if caller supports us returning a tuplestore */
> + if (rsinfo == NULL || !IsA(rsinfo, ReturnSetInfo))
> + ereport(ERROR,
> + (errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
> + errmsg("set-valued function called in context that cannot "
> + "accept a set")));
> + if (!(rsinfo->allowedModes & SFRM_Materialize))
> + ereport(ERROR,
> + (errcode(ERRCODE_SYNTAX_ERROR),
> + errmsg("materialize mode required, but it is not allowed "
> + "in this context")));

Thanks for the review!

I believe these v12 patches resolve the two issues you raised.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v12-0001-Adding-function-verify_btreeam-and-bumping-versi.patch application/octet-stream 65.1 KB
v12-0002-Adding-function-verify_heapam-to-amcheck-module.patch application/octet-stream 57.0 KB
v12-0003-Adding-contrib-module-pg_amcheck.patch application/octet-stream 55.8 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2020-07-22 01:19:34 Re: Comment referencing incorrect algorithm
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2020-07-22 00:46:59 Re: factorial function/phase out postfix operators?