| From: | Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-pkg-debian(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org,Phil Endecott <spam_from_pgsql_lists(at)chezphil(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Keeping Postgresql-9.6 on Buster |
| Date: | 2019-07-11 05:32:40 |
| Message-ID: | F02A477F-3EA1-4855-BA4A-EE3E6FD82CF3@df7cb.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-pkg-debian |
Am 10. Juli 2019 17:39:30 MESZ schrieb Phil Endecott <spam_from_pgsql_lists(at)chezphil(dot)org>:
>Dear Experts,
>
>I have a couple of cloud servers currently running PostgreSQL-9.6 on
>Debian Stretch with streaming replication from one to the other.
>
>I'd like to upgrade these to Buster, but keep PostgreSQL-9.6 for the
>time being. I think the packages at apt.postgresql.org will help
>me to do this. Can anyone offer any advice?
Yes. This is one of the use cases for that repository.
>In particular, the Buster release notes mention an issue with
>locales. Is this something that I need to worry about even if I
>keep PostgreSQL-9.6?
Still affected.
How does this interact with my replication
>setup? Can I replicate (temporarily) to an machine that has been
>upgraded to the new locales from one that hasn't?
No.
Christoph
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Phil Endecott | 2019-07-11 12:30:37 | Re: Keeping Postgresql-9.6 on Buster |
| Previous Message | Phil Endecott | 2019-07-10 15:39:30 | Keeping Postgresql-9.6 on Buster |