RE: pgsql/src/backend/commands (command.c vacuum.c)

From: "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Jan Wieck" <wieck(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: pgsql/src/backend/commands (command.c vacuum.c)
Date: 2000-12-09 13:23:22
Message-ID: EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJOEBLDBAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Wieck
> Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 1:18 AM
> To: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/commands (command.c vacuum.c)
>
>
> Date: Wednesday, July 5, 2000 @ 12:17:41
> Author: wieck
>
> Update of /home/projects/pgsql/cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/commands
> from hub.org:/tmp/cvs-serv21402/backend/commands
>
> Modified Files:
> command.c vacuum.c
>
> ----------------------------- Log Message -----------------------------
>
> Changed TOAST relations to have relkind RELKIND_TOASTVALUE.
>
> Special handling of TOAST relations during VACUUM. TOAST relations
> are vacuumed while the lock on the master table is still active.
>

It seems very dangerous to me.
When VACUUM of a master table was finished, the transaction is
in already committed state in many cases.

Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-12-09 15:52:05 Re: pgsql/src/backend/commands (command.c vacuum.c)
Previous Message momjian 2000-12-09 04:57:32 pgsql/doc/src/FAQ (FAQ_DEV.html)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2000-12-09 13:41:37 Re: OK, does anyone have any better ideas?
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2000-12-09 13:23:09 RE: [HACKERS] Japan pictures