| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nicolas Paris <niparisco(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>,pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: New Copy Formats - avro/orc/parquet |
| Date: | 2018-02-11 20:03:14 |
| Message-ID: | EF8C176E-03EA-4AD6-83FF-BCF5DBC76B20@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On February 11, 2018 12:00:12 PM PST, Nicolas Paris <niparisco(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > That is true, but the question is how significant the overhead is.
>If
>> > it's 50% then reducing it would make perfect sense. If it's 1% then
>no
>> > one if going to be bothered by it.
>>
>> I think it's pretty clear that it's going to be way way much more
>than
>> 1%.
>
>Good news but not sure to anderstand why.
I think you might have misunderstood my reply? I'm saying that going through PROGRAM will have significant overhead. I can't quite make sense of the rest of your reply otherwise?
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nicolas Paris | 2018-02-11 20:41:26 | Re: New Copy Formats - avro/orc/parquet |
| Previous Message | Nicolas Paris | 2018-02-11 20:00:12 | Re: New Copy Formats - avro/orc/parquet |