| From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Oleg <o(dot)sibiryakov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Documentation improvement patch |
| Date: | 2025-11-19 14:14:05 |
| Message-ID: | EF13E1C9-2E72-4EA7-8562-A85F4184BD4E@yesql.se |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
> On 19 Nov 2025, at 12:02, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> The following changes are left in your patch that should not be changed per the above discussion (all in doc/src/sgml/protocol.sgml):
I did consider these to be separate but re-reading I agree that they should be
removed.
> Separately, maybe this could be improved further:
>
> - Sets the maximum number of open files each server subprocess is
> + Sets the maximum number of files each server subprocess is
> allowed to open simultaneously; files already opened in the
>
> I think it would be more correct to say something like "... number of files each server subprocess is allowed to have open simultaneously ..." (not how many open actions are happening concurrently).
I wonder if the original intent was to write "Sets the maximum number of open
files each server subprocess is allowed to have simultaneously;"? That being
said, your suggestion is better so I'll go with that.
I will push the patch with the above changes a bit later today.
--
Daniel Gustafsson
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alpha Shuro | 2025-11-22 08:07:01 | (docs): add missing info about ShareLocks |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2025-11-19 11:02:23 | Re: Documentation improvement patch |