Re: BUG #18986: SIGSEGV in nodeModifyTable.c during Parallel Execution

From: Yaroslav Syrytsia <me(at)ys(dot)lc>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, y(at)lll(dot)gd <y(at)lll(dot)gd>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #18986: SIGSEGV in nodeModifyTable.c during Parallel Execution
Date: 2025-07-18 10:36:41
Message-ID: EDE60B8C-04C0-4C1B-A555-49AABA18057F@getmailspring.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Hello,

I just made a fresh build:
commit 91ad1bdef8e46983d82d2723c6e1c05e004f74c5 (HEAD -> 17_stable, origin/REL_17_STABLE)
Author: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Date: Fri Jul 18 10:01:31 2025 +0100

Fix concurrent update trigger issues with MERGE in a CTE.
Can confirm that the issue is resolved now.
Thanks!
Yaroslav.
On Jul 18 2025, at 11:19 am, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 at 07:46, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > I'll push this in a day or so in any case, since it's clearly fixing
> > *an* issue, even if it doesn't entirely fix the OP's issue.
> >
>
> Pushed.
> Regards,
> Dean
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Bug reporting form 2025-07-19 09:43:49 BUG #18991: NUMA test fails on machine with two NUMA nodes when building 18beta2
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2025-07-18 09:19:14 Re: BUG #18986: SIGSEGV in nodeModifyTable.c during Parallel Execution