Re: [PATCH v1] Fixed a spelling error in the comments in gininsert.c

From: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tender Wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Fixed a spelling error in the comments in gininsert.c
Date: 2025-12-20 00:31:28
Message-ID: EDC7010E-9291-40C7-8501-B7D0217487D4@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Dec 20, 2025, at 08:24, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 01:55:14PM +0800, Tender Wang wrote:
>> I just found another typo in gininsert.c(maybe on a new thread)
>> Comments for _gin_build_tuple():
>>
>> "
>> * For by-reference data types, we store the actual data. For by-val types
>> * we simply copy the whole Datum, so that we don't have to care about stuff
>> * like endianess etc.
>> "
>>
>> "endianess" should be "endianness".
>
> Indeed. Thanks.
> --
> Michael

I found that earlier, but when I checked with https://www.onelook.com/?w=endianess, it has two matches, so I guessed that spelling is acceptable.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2025-12-20 01:37:35 Re: Fix typo 586/686 in atomics/arch-x86.h
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2025-12-20 00:24:03 Re: [PATCH v1] Fixed a spelling error in the comments in gininsert.c