| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joel Jacobson <joel(at)gluefinance(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: contrib/snapshot |
| Date: | 2010-12-31 18:27:05 |
| Message-ID: | EDAD4218-C9A4-4DE5-80C1-C91AC76618DA@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Dec 31, 2010, at 10:15 AM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> 2010/12/31 David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
> This looks awesome, Joel! One question: Why the dependence on pg_crypto? If it's just for SHA1 support, and you're just using it to to create hashes of function bodies, I suspect that you could also use the core MD5() function, yes?
>
> Thanks for fast reply. My guests hate me becuase I had to escape from the dinner party, but I simply couldn't wait a whole year fixing this bug.
lol! Go enjoy the party. There was no rush -- and no bug! :-)
Best,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-12-31 18:55:30 | Re: contrib/snapshot |
| Previous Message | Joel Jacobson | 2010-12-31 18:15:25 | Re: contrib/snapshot |