| From: | "Nagaura, Ryohei" <nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'Michael Paquier' <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Fabien COELHO' <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, 'Kyotaro HORIGUCHI' <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: Timeout parameters |
| Date: | 2019-04-08 04:32:34 |
| Message-ID: | EDA4195584F5064680D8130B1CA91C454128AC@G01JPEXMBYT04 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, Michael-san.
> From: Michael Paquier [mailto:michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz]
> I have just committed the GUC and libpq portion for TCP_USER_TIMEOUT after a
> last lookup, and I have cleaned up a couple of places. It is a bit disappointing
> to see the option supported on Linux, but not on Windows, Solaris and BSD as
> far as I can see. Still that's useful in itself for more control of the TCP
> connection. Hopefully I forgot nobody in the review credits.
I confirmed your commitment. Thank you.
> I am marking the CF entry as committed. In the future, it would be better to
> not propose multiple concepts on the same thread, and if the socket_timeout
> business is resubmitted, I would suggest a completely new CF entry, and a new
> thread.
Thank you for your suggestion.
I think it would be better too.
Best regards,
---------------------
Ryohei Nagaura
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2019-04-08 04:37:16 | Re: Back-branch bugs with fully-prunable UPDATEs |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2019-04-08 03:59:10 | Re: ToDo: show size of partitioned table |