RE: Timeout parameters

From: "Nagaura, Ryohei" <nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: "Nagaura, Ryohei" <nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Kyotaro HORIGUCHI' <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: "coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr" <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Timeout parameters
Date: 2019-03-28 10:11:09
Message-ID: EDA4195584F5064680D8130B1CA91C4540F2A6@G01JPEXMBYT04
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi, all.

# This is a supplement of my current patches.

> From: Nagaura, Ryohei [mailto:nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com]
> > In TCP_backend patch:
> > I think this is not mentioning backend. Why don't you copy'n paste
> > then modify the description of tcp_keepalives_idle? Perhaps it needs
> a
> > similar caveat related to Windows.
I modified documentation with referring ones of tcp_keepalives_*.

Also, Note that:
1) I added <note> about windows OS and some linux kernels.
2) Documentations about TCP_USER_TIMEOUT is made citing description of [1].
# The client-side patch does as well.
3) Same as keepalives*, I used both "0" and zero.
I can't recognize why to use both of them.
Is there anyone who know it?

Best regards,
Ryohei Nagaura

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2019-03-28 10:16:47 Re: speeding up planning with partitions
Previous Message Dmitry Dolgov 2019-03-28 10:01:24 Re: Index Skip Scan