RE: Timeout parameters

From: "Nagaura, Ryohei" <nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "'Kyotaro HORIGUCHI'" <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: "coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr" <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz" <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Timeout parameters
Date: 2019-03-28 08:58:54
Message-ID: EDA4195584F5064680D8130B1CA91C4540F197@G01JPEXMBYT04
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi, Tsunakawa-san.

> From: Tsunakawa, Takayuki [mailto:tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com]
> I think that's for the case where the modules is built on an OS that
> supports TCP_USER_TIMEOUT (#ifdef TCP_USER_TIMEOUT is true), and the
> module is used on an older OS that doesn't support TCP_USER_TIMEOUT. I
> remember I was sometimes able to do such a thing on Linux and Solaris.
> If we don't have to handle such usage, I agree about removing the special
> handling of ENOTPROTO.
I don't know how much there are such systems, but your story feels remote for me.
Therefore I adopted Horiguchi-san's idea.

Best regards,
---------------------
Ryohei Nagaura

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Darafei Komяpa Praliaskouski 2019-03-28 09:03:47 Re: Berserk Autovacuum (let's save next Mandrill)
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2019-03-28 08:48:41 Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)