RE: [OT] Any major users of postgresql?

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Joe Brenner" <doom(at)kzsu(dot)stanford(dot)edu>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: [OT] Any major users of postgresql?
Date: 2001-07-04 01:52:08
Message-ID: ECEHIKNFIMMECLEBJFIGOECHCBAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Try:

www.sourceforge.net (A big, big PGsql based site)
or
www.calorieking.com (A site I've worked on)
or
http://www.pgsql.com/user_gallery/ (The pgsql user gallery)

Let me tell you right now that MySQL initially sounds sexy, but it is a
NIGHTMARE without referential integrity and transaction support.

Chris

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Joe Brenner
> Sent: Wednesday, 4 July 2001 1:44 AM
> To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [HACKERS] [OT] Any major users of postgresql?
>
>
>
> Sorry to bug the list with something a bit off topic, but
> I've been scrounging around for some examples of someone
> doing some fairly serious work with postgresql, and haven't
> yet been able to turn any up. Someone here must know a few
> off the top of their head...
>
> The reason I'm asking is that the place that I work is
> actually contemplating reverting from Oracle's expensive
> bugs to MySQL's (supposedly) cheap ones. They'd consider
> postgresql, but they figure that with MySQL they can at
> least point to sites that pump a fair amount of data with it
> (e.g. mp3.com).

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-07-04 03:16:24 Re: stuck spin lock with many concurrent users
Previous Message Harry Yau 2001-07-04 01:43:22 WAL Question