From: | "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | "Joe Brenner" <doom(at)kzsu(dot)stanford(dot)edu>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: [OT] Any major users of postgresql? |
Date: | 2001-07-04 01:52:08 |
Message-ID: | ECEHIKNFIMMECLEBJFIGOECHCBAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Try:
www.sourceforge.net (A big, big PGsql based site)
or
www.calorieking.com (A site I've worked on)
or
http://www.pgsql.com/user_gallery/ (The pgsql user gallery)
Let me tell you right now that MySQL initially sounds sexy, but it is a
NIGHTMARE without referential integrity and transaction support.
Chris
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org]On Behalf Of Joe Brenner
> Sent: Wednesday, 4 July 2001 1:44 AM
> To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [HACKERS] [OT] Any major users of postgresql?
>
>
>
> Sorry to bug the list with something a bit off topic, but
> I've been scrounging around for some examples of someone
> doing some fairly serious work with postgresql, and haven't
> yet been able to turn any up. Someone here must know a few
> off the top of their head...
>
> The reason I'm asking is that the place that I work is
> actually contemplating reverting from Oracle's expensive
> bugs to MySQL's (supposedly) cheap ones. They'd consider
> postgresql, but they figure that with MySQL they can at
> least point to sites that pump a fair amount of data with it
> (e.g. mp3.com)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-07-04 03:16:24 | Re: stuck spin lock with many concurrent users |
Previous Message | Harry Yau | 2001-07-04 01:43:22 | WAL Question |