Re: storing binary data

From: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Joe Conway" <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com>, "Jason Orendorff" <jason(at)jorendorff(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: storing binary data
Date: 2001-10-25 02:31:02
Message-ID: ECEHIKNFIMMECLEBJFIGIEFHCCAA.chriskl@familyhealth.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > I get the impression that the
> > SELECT query it is based on is cached (ie. a cached query plan).
>
> Nope. If there's something in the docs that makes you think so,
> point out so I can fix it ;-)

Hmmm...I could have sworn that you mentioned in passing something about
cached query plans and VIEWs - I must have been in dream land.

Chris

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-10-25 04:49:16 Re: "Triggered data change violation", once again
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-10-25 02:21:38 Re: storing binary data