Re: SSD Drives

From: Ben Chobot <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>
To: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SSD Drives
Date: 2014-04-03 18:29:45
Message-ID: EC7D8AE4-9C54-4BC3-A878-DC5E3752678E@silentmedia.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Apr 3, 2014, at 12:47 PM, John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> wrote:

> On 4/3/2014 9:26 AM, Joe Van Dyk wrote:
>> Related, anyone have any thoughts on using postgresql on Amazon's EC2 SSDs? Been looking at http://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2013/12/19/announcing-the-next-generation-of-amazon-ec2-high-i/o-instance
>>
>
> if your data isn't very important, by all means, keep it on someone elses virtualized infrastructure with no performance or reliability guarantees.

Well that’s not quite fair. AWS guarantees performance for those instances (http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/i2-instances.html#i2-instances-diskperf). They also guarantee their instances will fail sooner or later, with or without warning (at which point you will loose all your data unless you’ve been putting copies onto a different system).

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dev Kumkar 2014-04-03 18:46:22 Re: [ANNOUNCE] == PostgreSQL Weekly News - April 01 2014 ==
Previous Message Andy Colson 2014-04-03 18:22:10 Re: [ANNOUNCE] == PostgreSQL Weekly News - April 01 2014 ==