Re: Build 8.2 with an old linker

From: Thorkil Olesen <thorkil(at)pip(dot)dknet(dot)dk>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Build 8.2 with an old linker
Date: 2006-12-28 22:49:29
Message-ID: E9E63091-6370-4FFD-833A-E7427CD42A58@pip.dknet.dk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-ports

Den 28/12/2006 kl. 0.57 skrev Tom Lane:

> "Thorkil Olesen" <thorkil(at)pip(dot)dknet(dot)dk> writes:
>> exports.list: exports.txt
>> - echo '{ global:' >$@
>> + echo 'VERSION { global:' >$@
>
> Actually ... on second look, doesn't that change the semantics?
>
> We are not trying to establish a versioned API here, only restrict
> symbol visibility. I think if we do the above we just created a
> versioned API with a version name of "VERSION", which does not seem
> like a good idea.

You might be right.

I'd think that if the name will never be changed, it would mean the
same thing, but I don't know really. I just know that it solved my
build-problem, and I wanted to share that information with the list.
(Probably some more meaningful name than 'VERSION' could be chosen.)

Thank you for the comments.

Best regards, Thorkil.

--
Thorkil Olesen, Hanstholm
Tel. +45 97 96 00 19

In response to

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew MacLeod 2007-01-18 17:33:50 contrib/dblink win32 binary on Postgres 8.x?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-12-27 23:57:59 Re: Build 8.2 with an old linker