Re: Switch to multi-inserts for pg_depend

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Switch to multi-inserts for pg_depend
Date: 2020-09-03 10:47:22
Message-ID: E975AF1C-7AC2-4748-886E-40CAD914A8A1@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 3 Sep 2020, at 12:19, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 09:47:07AM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> I think this version is a clear improvement. Nothing more sticks out from a
>> read-through.
>
> Thanks for taking the time to look at it, Daniel. We of course could
> still try to figure out how we could group all dependencies without
> worrying about their type, but I'd like to leave that as future work
> for now. This is much more complex than what's proposed on this
> thread, and I am not sure if we really need to make this stuff more
> complex for this purpose.

Agreed, I think that's a separate piece of work and discussion.

cheers ./daniel

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2020-09-03 11:21:59 [PATCH] Detect escape of ErrorContextCallback stack pointers (and from PG_TRY() )
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-09-03 10:19:35 Re: Switch to multi-inserts for pg_depend