| From: | Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease |
| Date: | 2007-07-13 21:02:51 |
| Message-ID: | E82218D6-F051-45D2-8136-21AC3014F954@decibel.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Jul 13, 2007, at 3:24 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Jonah H. Harris wrote:
>> On 7/13/07, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>> That kind of makes my point :)
>> The fact is, if you write a PostgreSQL-only app, it will run
>> perfectly
>> on PostgreSQL or EnterpriseDB.
>
> But that isn't what I asked. I asked if I wrote an EnterpriseDB app
> would it run on PostgreSQL, the answer is clearly no. Yes, yes we
> can of course not use Enterprise (Oracle) features, but one of the
> benefits of EnterpriseDB is that I "can" use those Oracle features.
>
> That is my only point.
And if someone buys Mammoth and sets up replication, they're just as
locked-in. Actually more-so, since EnterpriseDB can be used as a
"bridge" to get you from Oracle to PostgreSQL or vice-versa.
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2007-07-13 21:04:24 | Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease |
| Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2007-07-13 21:01:31 | Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease |