From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Ludek Finstrle" <luf(at)pzkagis(dot)cz>, "Andrus Moor" <eetasoft(at)online(dot)ee> |
Cc: | <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Access violation C5 error on Visual FoxPro SQLEXEC() call after error |
Date: | 2005-12-15 09:34:46 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7E9DE@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Ludek Finstrle
> Sent: 14 December 2005 01:11
> To: Andrus Moor
> Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Access violation C5 error on Visual
> FoxPro SQLEXEC() call after error
>
> Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 11:50:33AM +0200, Andrus Moor napsal(a):
> > Driver: psqlodbc-8_01_0104.zip ( I think)
> >
> > Platform: Visual FoxPro 09.00.0000.3504 for Windows [Nov 4
> 2005 17:39:44]
> >
> > Any idea how to fix this ?
>
> I tried to fix it but this seems to me as VFP bad behaviour. I'm
> againist add this code to official release unless we make new option
> in configure DSN dialog.
We need to be reducing the number of options, not increasing them if at
all possible!
> Dave I propose to rollback your patch for the first Andrus's problem
> as it breaks ODBC specification (if I understand this well):
> | After SQLExecute or SQLExecDirect returns SQL_NEED_DATA and before
> | data has been sent for all data-at-execution parameters,
> | an application can call SQLCancel to cancel the statement execution.
> | After the statement has been canceled, the application can call
> | SQLExecute or SQLExecDirect again.
>
> I think bind parameters can't be destroyed in SQLCancel.
Yeah, after re-reading it, I think you're right. :-(
Regards, Dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrus | 2005-12-15 10:47:27 | Re: Access violation C5 error on Visual FoxPro SQLEXEC() call after error |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2005-12-15 09:11:39 | Re: Next development steps? |