Re: 1.4 Branch & pg_config

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, "pgadmin-hackers" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 1.4 Branch & pg_config
Date: 2005-12-01 08:40:56
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4E7E54B@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Backporting is definitely not on my list of things to do, so I've
applied the patch - thanks!

Regards, Dave.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of
> Florian G. Pflug
> Sent: 30 November 2005 20:20
> To: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] 1.4 Branch & pg_config
>
> Hi
>
> I just noted that the OSX-build of the 1.4 build is broken
> due to the inclusion of the pg_dump-in-appbundle patch. The
> patch assumes that PG_CONFIG is available inside pkg/mac/Makefile.am,
> but the 1.4 buildsystem doesn't know about PG_CONFIG.
>
> Would it be feasable to backport the postgres-specific
> changes in the buildsystem to 1.4? If not, please apply
> the attached patch. It's the most primitiv patch possible - it adds
> AC_SUBST(LIBPQ_HOME) to acinclude.m4, and then hopes
> that LIBPQ_HOME/bin/pg_{dump|restore} exists. It's not
> pretty, but at least it makes building possible again ;-)
>
> If you plan to backport the buildsystem-changes, then just
> ignore this patch ;-)
>
> greetings, Florian Pflug
>
>

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message svn 2005-12-01 08:48:21 SVN Commit by dpage: r4770 - trunk/pgadmin3/i18n/fr_FR
Previous Message svn 2005-12-01 08:39:39 SVN Commit by dpage: r4769 - in branches/REL-1_4_0_PATCHES/pgadmin3: . pkg/mac