From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
Cc: | "pgadmin-hackers" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql 8.1 instrumentation status |
Date: | 2005-08-30 08:28:44 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4AC9D32@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de]
> Sent: 30 August 2005 09:08
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] pgsql 8.1 instrumentation status
>
> Dave Page wrote:
>
> >>Adapting the 8.0 admin package to 8.1 is much less effort
> >>than adapting
> >>to the pgsql functions.
> >
> >
> > Maybe, but given the effort I put in, and Magnus put in to
> get the code
> > included in the server in as much of it's original form as
> possible, I'm
> > damned if I'm just going to take that route now 'because it's less
> > effort'.
>
> I can post my code that restores full functionality now, with
> the option
> to switch them to LANGUAGE INTERNAL for backend functions
> that work, or
> do nothing. I won't implement code that belongs on the server
> in pgadmin.
LANGUAGE INTERNAL??
/D
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-08-30 09:14:15 | Re: pgsql 8.1 instrumentation status |
Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-08-30 08:08:03 | Re: pgsql 8.1 instrumentation status |