CVS Head: Pg_ctl bug?

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: CVS Head: Pg_ctl bug?
Date: 2005-08-29 18:12:00
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4AC9CF6@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs


I just noticed that if I don't specify a data directory either on the
command line or in $PGDATA,, pg_ctl fails silently on Windows (haven't
been able to test other platforms atm). Is this a bug or an oversight -
an error message would seem appropriate?

/D

postgres(at)PC30:/usr/local/pgsql$ bin/pg_ctl start
postgres(at)PC30:/usr/local/pgsql$ bin/pg_ctl -D data start
postmaster starting
postgres(at)PC30:/usr/local/pgsql$ LOG: database system was interrupted at
2005-08-29 00:34:07 GMT Standard Time
LOG: checkpoint record is at 0/39F218
LOG: redo record is at 0/39F218; undo record is at 0/0; shutdown TRUE
LOG: next transaction ID: 1478; next OID: 16392
LOG: next MultiXactId: 1; next MultiXactOffset: 0
LOG: database system was not properly shut down; automatic recovery in
progress
LOG: record with zero length at 0/39F260
LOG: redo is not required
LOG: database system is ready
LOG: transaction ID wrap limit is 2147484144, limited by database
"postgres"

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2005-08-29 18:31:41 Re: [BUGS] beta page has broken link to bug submission
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-08-29 16:27:34 Re: BUG #1854: SQL Bug