| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Stephen Frost" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Remote administration functionality |
| Date: | 2005-08-01 14:53:27 |
| Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4AC96A9@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Frost [mailto:sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net]
> Sent: 01 August 2005 15:51
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Bruce Momjian; Andreas Pflug; Tom Lane; Magnus Hagander;
> PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Remote administration functionality
>
>
> This isn't actually an argument against my proposal. The
> admin doesn't
> edit pg_shadow using vi because it's understood to be 'owned' by the
> database. The same would be true of 'pg_hba' in my solution.
Only if it were moved to a different location and renamed. Otherwise
people would be bound to try to edit it as that is what they have done
for years.
Regards, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2005-08-01 14:56:27 | Re: Remote administration functionality |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2005-08-01 14:52:00 | Re: Remote administration functionality |