From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
Cc: | "Chris" <chris(dot)velevitch(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Eclipse version of pgAdmin |
Date: | 2005-07-14 11:40:46 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4AC9235@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de]
> Sent: 14 July 2005 12:25
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Chris; pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] Eclipse version of pgAdmin
>
> Dave Page wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: pgadmin-support-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> >>[mailto:pgadmin-support-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Chris
> >>Sent: 14 July 2005 06:48
> >>To: pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org
> >>Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] Eclipse version of pgAdmin
> >>
> >>Dave Page <dpage <at> vale-housing.co.uk> writes:
> >>
> >>
> >>>>Is there an Eclipse version of pgAdmin?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>No.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Would anyone be interested in developing one?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Not from here I doubt. From what little I know of Eclispe, that would
> >meant replacing all the wx code with the Eclipse equivalent.
> That would
> >mean a massive amount of work for no gain for the vast
> majority of us.
> >
> >
>
> Well a piece of software not written in Java can't be good, no?
*Splorf* I hadn't even noticed that it was written in Java, just that it
provided a a standard framework for plugin utilities!
/D
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | roy vinner | 2005-07-14 14:58:46 | Re: compilation problems on Mandrake 10.1 |
Previous Message | Andreas Pflug | 2005-07-14 11:24:39 | Re: Eclipse version of pgAdmin |