Re: Autovacuum in the backend

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Cc: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>, <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at>, <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>, <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Autovacuum in the backend
Date: 2005-06-16 16:01:15
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E490E548@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de]
> Sent: 16 June 2005 15:14
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Matthew T. O'Connor; Andrew Dunstan;
> swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au; postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at;
> alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl; pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us;
> pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Autovacuum in the backend
>
> Dave,
>
> i wonder if we should aim to have pgAgent in the backend
> which was one
> of the reasons why I considered to have it converted from C++
> to pure C.

In previous discussions on -hackers when ppl raised the idea of
something like pgAgent being built into the backend, istm that the
majority of people were against the idea.

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2005-06-16 16:02:25 Re: PROPOSAL - User's exception in PL/pgSQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-06-16 16:00:41 Re: [PATCHES] Escape handling in strings