Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Frontend/Backend protocol 3.0

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Sivakumar K" <sivakumark(at)pervasive-postgres(dot)com>,<pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, <fuerth(at)sqlpower(dot)ca>
Cc: <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Frontend/Backend protocol 3.0
Date: 2005-06-07 09:31:22
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-odbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org 
> [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Sivakumar K
> Sent: 07 June 2005 09:44
> To: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us; fuerth(at)sqlpower(dot)ca
> Cc: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com; pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Frontend/Backend protocol 3.0
> Hi all,
> In continuation to my previous mail, here is an overview on 
> the approach
> that we have taken. We had a few design goals when we started on this
> exercise.
> 1. ODBC driver should still support socket mode.
> 2. Use if-defs minimally.
> 3. The code change should be minimal.
> 4. Use a compile time flag USE_LIBPQ to switch between libPQ 
> and socket.

Why keep the socket stuff? The whole point is to get rid of it and the
associated complexity and rely on libpq. 

Regards, Dave.

pgsql-odbc by date

Next:From: Alberto VeloDate: 2005-06-07 11:12:31
Subject: Microsoft.Data.ODBC, System.Data.ODBC, psqlodbc: where's the bug?
Previous:From: Sivakumar KDate: 2005-06-07 08:44:29
Subject: Re: Frontend/Backend protocol 3.0

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group