Re: No WX_2_6_BRANCH?

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Cc: "pgadmin-hackers" <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: No WX_2_6_BRANCH?
Date: 2005-04-26 15:05:38
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E472C510@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgadmin-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of
> Andreas Pflug
> Sent: 26 April 2005 15:42
> To: Florian G. Pflug
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] No WX_2_6_BRANCH?
>
> Hm, we usually use a very exact version for snapshots, in
> this case it
> would be 2.6.0 release. For development it's ok to use cvs
> head, but not
> for daily builds.

Speaking on which, I'm finding that 2.6 will not compile on Slackware 9
or 10 with --enable-mimetype=no. Is this still required (I can't see any
mention of it in the 2.6 README).

Regards, Dave

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian G. Pflug 2005-04-26 15:23:46 Re: No WX_2_6_BRANCH?
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2005-04-26 14:42:23 Re: No WX_2_6_BRANCH?