Re: BUG #1487: Index problem

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, "Tom Yeh" <tom_m_yeh(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #1487: Index problem
Date: 2005-02-21 16:04:15
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E472B63E@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-bugs-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-bugs-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Richard Huxton
> Sent: 21 February 2005 15:37
> To: Tom Yeh
> Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #1487: Index problem
>
> > The above can be replicated by using pgAdmin III only.
>
> Are you saying it doesn't do this from psql?

pgAdmin uses libpq, just as psql does, so I cannot imagine why this
would be the case. pgAdmin also does not do anything to try to affect
query plans in any way.

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2005-02-21 16:12:31 Re: BUG #1487: Index problem
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2005-02-21 15:36:57 Re: BUG #1487: Index problem