Re: New ODBC driver

> -----Original Message-----
> From: markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com [mailto:markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com]
> Sent: 01 December 2004 16:21
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] New ODBC driver
>
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com [mailto:markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com]
> >> Sent: 01 December 2004 15:02
> >> To: Dave Page
> >> Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> >> Subject: Re: [ODBC] New ODBC driver
> >>
> >> > I don't think it would be realistic to mix the two
> >> approaches though -
> >> > if only because they couldn't share a single database connection.
> >>
> >> Why is this an issue? Why not create multiple connections?
> >
> > Efficiency for a start - but what would you use each for? Any
> > application developer is going to expect everything to use the same
> > connection - how do you direct a 'SET' statement? What about
> > transaction isolation?
> >
> > Regards, Dave.
>
> OK, I'm going to take a look at it.
>
> I have a stupid question, where is the location of the ODBC
> source? Is it part of PostgreSQL?
>

http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/psqlodbc, in the CVS section.

Regards, Dave,