From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New ODBC driver |
Date: | 2004-12-01 16:27:57 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4527C11@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com [mailto:markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com]
> Sent: 01 December 2004 16:21
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] New ODBC driver
>
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com [mailto:markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com]
> >> Sent: 01 December 2004 15:02
> >> To: Dave Page
> >> Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> >> Subject: Re: [ODBC] New ODBC driver
> >>
> >> > I don't think it would be realistic to mix the two
> >> approaches though -
> >> > if only because they couldn't share a single database connection.
> >>
> >> Why is this an issue? Why not create multiple connections?
> >
> > Efficiency for a start - but what would you use each for? Any
> > application developer is going to expect everything to use the same
> > connection - how do you direct a 'SET' statement? What about
> > transaction isolation?
> >
> > Regards, Dave.
>
> OK, I'm going to take a look at it.
>
> I have a stupid question, where is the location of the ODBC
> source? Is it part of PostgreSQL?
>
http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/psqlodbc, in the CVS section.
Regards, Dave,
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simeó Reig | 2004-12-01 16:28:08 | Re: ODBC driver for Windows & future... |
Previous Message | markw | 2004-12-01 16:20:54 | Re: New ODBC driver |