Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org]
> Sent: 28 October 2004 16:19
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: Mitch Pirtle; PostgreSQL www; PostgreSQL advocacy
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [pgsql-www] PostgreSQL.org
> Design Proposal
>
> Stupid question ... do we have somewhere a layout of the long
> term plan?
> For instance, eventually we want to merge Gborg -> PgFoundry,
> so that we have one projects related site ... I believe(?)
> advocacy is meant to merge into www itself? And there has
> been talk of better integrating developer, at least in so far
> as layout?

Not yet. I've been quoting a basic plan, but that's more like:

1) Build new framework.
2) Apply new design.
3) Merge/overhaul other sites.

1 & 2 got merged when Lukasz presented the design we all accepted, and
have been worked on extensively. 3 has yet to have more than a few words
said about it - I'm cautious to even bring it up right now, as I think
it'll only delay 1 & 2 further.

Regards, Dave