| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Mitch Pirtle <mitch(dot)pirtle(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |
| Date: | 2004-10-28 15:19:29 |
| Message-ID: | 20041028121715.U88099@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Dave Page wrote:
>> Third, the 'web presence' of the Postgres community as a
>> whole is a mess. Gborg, pgfoundry, www, advocacy, how many
>> other sites are there? And in what state? Sheesh, this is
>> as bad as python. (slaps
>> forehead)
>
> Precisely my point - we know this, and its part of the longterm plan.
> Catch up on the previous discussions first, and then you'll be in a
> better position to object to doing it 'our way (TM)'.
Stupid question ... do we have somewhere a layout of the long term plan?
For instance, eventually we want to merge Gborg -> PgFoundry, so that we
have one projects related site ... I believe(?) advocacy is meant to merge
into www itself? And there has been talk of better integrating developer,
at least in so far as layout?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2004-10-28 15:42:57 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |
| Previous Message | Jean-Paul ARGUDO | 2004-10-28 14:43:39 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2004-10-28 15:42:57 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |
| Previous Message | Jean-Paul ARGUDO | 2004-10-28 14:43:39 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |