| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | <mcohan(at)adnc(dot)net>, <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Snapshot release 08.00.0002 uploaded |
| Date: | 2004-10-21 09:03:11 |
| Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4306D40@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Max Cohan
> Sent: 21 October 2004 07:49
> To: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Snapshot release 08.00.0002 uploaded
>
>
> You might want to submit this to the main bug/wish list.
> This seems like something sane and probably fairly easy to
> support in the server itself. It seems like there is nothing
> implicitly wrong with the "table"."field" syntax and the
> server itself should understand it.
It does. What it doesn't understand is mixed case unquoted identifiers,
which other databases should also barf on - the difference being,
PostgreSQL folds them to lower case, other DBMSs fold them to upper
case.
Regards, Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Lothar Behrens | 2004-10-23 11:13:05 | Still problems with pgODBC |
| Previous Message | Max Cohan | 2004-10-21 06:49:06 | Re: Snapshot release 08.00.0002 uploaded |