Re: Movement of FAQ's

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 11 October 2004 03:22
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: PostgreSQL www
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Movement of FAQ's
>
> Dave Page wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> > > Sent: 09 October 2004 01:30
> > > To: Dave Page
> > > Cc: PostgreSQL www
> > > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Movement of FAQ's
> > >
> > >
> > > Yes, most is installer-specific but there is some overlap.
> > > Let me work it out with Magnus.
> > >
> >
> > Err, OK. You did notice that I wrote it, not Magnus?
>
> Oh, no I didn't. Would you like to make adjustments to it
> and/or FAQ_MINGW so they point to each other and don't
> duplicate information?

I'm not entirely convinced that's the right answer. The main concern is
making things easy for the users - that's what I've tried to do with the
installer faq (which I now notice Magnus has been editting!) by covering
both installer specific stuff, and non-installer specific; a kindof 1
stop shop for all Win32 faqs. I appreciate that we don't necessarily
want the installer stuff in the main tree however. What about making the
version in the tree a subset of our one, simply covering the
mingw/compiliation issues which I can include in one standalone section
in our faq?

Regard,s Dave.