| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Note on libtool |
| Date: | 2004-07-19 07:37:32 |
| Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E41A7354@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Peter Eisentraut
> Sent: 17 July 2004 19:57
> To: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [ODBC] Note on libtool
>
> When you bootstrap a psqlodbc source tree for Unix (as
> described in README.unix), make sure the PostgreSQL source
> tree is CVS tip more recent than right now. Otherwise you
> may experience clashes between Autoconf macros provided by
> PostgreSQL and those provided by libtool, possibly leading to
> no shared libraries being built.
Thanks Peter - speaking of which, how many PostgreSQL macros are we
actually using in psqlODBC? Would it be a mammoth task to duplicate or
eliminate them to avoid the need to build in a source tree, or is it
simply not worth it?
Regards, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2004-07-19 07:40:41 | Re: ODBC Developers |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2004-07-19 07:25:10 | Re: Bug "Access violation at address XXXXX in module 'psqlodbc.dll'" |