Re: 64 Bit patch (WAS: psqlodbc developer)

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 64 Bit patch (WAS: psqlodbc developer)
Date: 2004-07-02 10:14:10
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40C3828@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net]
> Sent: 02 July 2004 10:06
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] 64 Bit patch (WAS: psqlodbc developer)
>
> Am Freitag, 2. Juli 2004 10:45 schrieben Sie:
> > I've forwarded this patch to the list for review before
> it's applied
> > (I don't use IODBC).
>
> If one uses iODBC then the include files are picked up from
> the installed version of iODBC. The files iodbc.h, isql.h,
> etc. in the source tree are sort of obsolete. They are only
> used for the "neither unixODBC nor iODBC"
> version of the driver, which is quite useless.

In which case, should they be removed to force the user to install
either iODBC or unixODBC first?

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2004-07-02 10:24:49 Re: Volunteer psqlODBC Developer Required
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-07-02 09:05:37 Re: 64 Bit patch (WAS: psqlodbc developer)