Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Petr Jelinek" <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
Date: 2006-07-18 13:46:39
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40154C041@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Petr Jelinek [mailto:pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net]
> Sent: 16 July 2006 18:05
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it
>
> Dave Page wrote:
> >
> > I have spare licences for most versions of Windows as well,
> so if Microsoft's virtual server product is not too expensive
> for us I can probably add a few platform variations to that
> box. I'll look into it.
>
> In fact MS released Virtual PC 2004 for free a couple days ago
> (http://www.microsoft.com/windows/virtualpc/default.mspx)

It seems that VMWare are following suit - their entry level VMWare
Server is now free for Windows and Linux :-)

http://www.vmware.com/products/server/

Regards, Dave.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-07-18 14:36:04 Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features?
Previous Message Joshua Reich 2006-07-18 13:45:39 Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch for contrib/cube