| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Arnaud Lesauvage" <thewild(at)freesurf(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Best high availability solution ? |
| Date: | 2006-05-31 11:00:40 |
| Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4013885C5@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnaud Lesauvage [mailto:thewild(at)freesurf(dot)fr]
> Sent: 31 May 2006 11:53
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Best high availability solution ?
>
> Dave Page a écrit :
> > The code is written, and is good as far as we are aware,
> but has not been through a beta/release cycle yet.
>
> OK, that's already pretty good then.
> Are there binary releases available ?
http://developer.pgadmin.org/~hiroshi/Slony-I/
That's built against 8.1 iirc.
USE AT YOUR OWN RISK!! IT MAY EAT YOUR DATA AND SET YOUR SERVER ON FIRE :-)
Regards, Dave.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Arnaud Lesauvage | 2006-05-31 11:06:50 | Re: Best high availability solution ? |
| Previous Message | Arnaud Lesauvage | 2006-05-31 10:53:21 | Re: Best high availability solution ? |