Re: snapshot/switch version number

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Ludek Finstrle" <luf(at)pzkagis(dot)cz>
Cc: <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: snapshot/switch version number
Date: 2006-04-21 14:02:21
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4011C9E86@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ludek Finstrle [mailto:luf(at)pzkagis(dot)cz]
> Sent: 21 April 2006 15:00
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] snapshot/switch version number
>
> Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 02:30:56PM +0100, Dave Page napsal(a):
> > > > I am trying to create a front-end to an existing postgres
> > > database in
> > > > MS Access 2002 using 8.01.20 Unicode ODBC driver. Some of
> > > the simpler
> > > > queries
> > >
> > > Please could you try 07.03.026X version? You can download it from
> > > pgfoundry.org. This version is much powerfull and stable
> (as I can
> > > see).
> >
> > I should probably build a new snapshot based on CVS tip sometime in
> > the next week or so. Anyone object?
>
> I agree.
>
> I vote for renumbering experimental branch to stable one (to
> 08.01.1001 or maybe 08.01.1000). 08.01.0XXX has no additional
> support (my opinion is it's waste of time).

It's already at 08.02.0001 (see
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-odbc/2006-04/msg00028.php)

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eliott 2006-04-21 14:10:38 Re: Access -> ODBC -> postgres
Previous Message Ludek Finstrle 2006-04-21 13:59:41 Re: snapshot/switch version number