Re: pgfoundry and gborg

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgfoundry and gborg
Date: 2006-04-13 08:49:00
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4011C9C85@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: 12 April 2006 22:33
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] pgfoundry and gborg
>
> Dave Page wrote:
> > As far as I'm aware we haven't even told project owners
> that we want
> > them to move, let alone offered them a migration path (I certainly
> > never received anything as owner of multiple projects.
> Simply turning
> > it off seems a good way to really cheese ppl off :-(
>
> At this point, I am happy to do _exactly_ that! It is what
> will make it get completed.

OK, I'll send any disgruntled project owners your way :-)

Seriously though, if nothing else we should give them notice ASAP that
this is going to be done.

Oh, and moving the pgweb project will require some non-trivial work to
ensure it doesn't break www.postgresql.org.

Regards, Dave.

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-04-13 12:32:50 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Further SPI
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2006-04-13 01:06:05 Re: Further SPI