Re: Future development

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bart Samwel" <bart(at)samwel(dot)tk>
Cc: "Ludek Finstrle" <luf(at)pzkagis(dot)cz>, <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Future development
Date: 2006-03-22 14:57:17
Message-ID: E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4011C970A@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Tom Lane
> Sent: 22 March 2006 14:54
> To: Bart Samwel
> Cc: Ludek Finstrle; pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Future development
>
> Bart Samwel <bart(at)samwel(dot)tk> writes:
> > Ludek Finstrle wrote:
> >> Could you explain me the "Level of rollback on errors"? I
> think that
> >> when programmer doesn't use autocommit mode he want react on errors
> >> himself.
>
> > Like I said in my other message, the 8.01 driver doesn't give me a
> > choice in how to react on errors at all: it forces me to
> rollback the
> > complete transaction. I want to have a choice in that. The
> 7.03 driver
> > allows me to set the "Level of rollback on errors" to
> "Statement", which
> > means that only the failed statement is rolled back, and
> *I* then have
> > the choice of whether I want to rollback the remainder of the
> > transaction as well, or that I want to continue / try
> something else.
>
> Really? Considering that there was no backend support at all
> for such a
> thing back in 7.*, this seems improbable.

Not in the backend, but the ODBC REL-07_03_ENHANCED branch has superior
savepoint support over CVS tip.

Regards, Dave.

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ludek Finstrle 2006-03-22 15:06:22 Re: ADO operations
Previous Message Dave Page 2006-03-22 14:55:27 Re: Future versions of psqlODBC