From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | "Zac Bowling" <contractor92(at)match(dot)com>, "Andreas Pflug" <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
Cc: | "Zac Bowling" <zac(at)zacbowling(dot)com>, <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Excessive GDI objects under WIN32 |
Date: | 2006-02-14 08:34:56 |
Message-ID: | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40103E0BB@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgadmin-support-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgadmin-support-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Zac Bowling
> Sent: 13 February 2006 22:50
> To: Andreas Pflug
> Cc: Zac Bowling; pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-support] Excessive GDI objects under WIN32
>
>
> The use of them isn't or not isn't a valid debate, but the
> over use of them is very valid. Anyways, I think I found the
> problem, and it appears to be inheirt to wxWidgets (had to
> rip it apart to find it). Some funny code comments around it
> as well. I'm going to send the patch in soon if I can fix it
> easily, but there might be a way to fix it in pgadmin without
> having to fix wxWidgets if anyone is interested. I'll reply
> later with more info when I get done and I get my build
> environment is setup correctly.
Yes, we're interested if it's a non-invasive (and appropriate) fix in
pgAdmin. I don't entirely disagree with Andreas' POV (I don't ever
recall hearing of anyone running out of GDI's running pgAdmin), and I've
certainly run it simultaneously with VC++6 and VS 2k3 & 2k5 (at the same
time - don't ask!!) without problems, but it doesn't hurt to save
resources.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zac Bowling | 2006-02-14 15:46:58 | Re: Excessive GDI objects under WIN32 |
Previous Message | Zac Bowling | 2006-02-13 22:50:13 | Re: Excessive GDI objects under WIN32 |